<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CG Pro Prints Canvas Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/</link>
	<description>Trent &#38; Stacy Gillespie - Top Colorado Mountain Wedding Photographers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 May 2021 20:23:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert		</title>
		<link>https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-4158</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2021 20:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gillphotos.com/?p=7421#comment-4158</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[thanks for the review, it really helped me alot]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the review, it really helped me alot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kerry		</title>
		<link>https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-1942</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gillphotos.com/?p=7421#comment-1942</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-1941&quot;&gt;Kerry&lt;/a&gt;.

Just appending a P.S. to my post. I sought clarification from the Support staffs both at Canvas on Demand and CGProPrints as to the relationship of these two outfits, and the question of whether their products differed in some way, or not. The two people I communicated with were quite open and helpful. This is what I learned: 

1. COD and CGProPrints are, in fact, a single printing entity.
 
2. The &quot;premium canvas&quot; product from both companies is exactly the same--- both outfits make their prints on the same equipment, using the same canvas, same ink, etc. Also---same 2-year warranty.

3. CGProPrints offers a few items that COD does not, e.g., metal prints.

4. Pricing and sale promotions differ.

Hopefully others here will find this info useful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-1941">Kerry</a>.</p>
<p>Just appending a P.S. to my post. I sought clarification from the Support staffs both at Canvas on Demand and CGProPrints as to the relationship of these two outfits, and the question of whether their products differed in some way, or not. The two people I communicated with were quite open and helpful. This is what I learned: </p>
<p>1. COD and CGProPrints are, in fact, a single printing entity.</p>
<p>2. The &#8220;premium canvas&#8221; product from both companies is exactly the same&#8212; both outfits make their prints on the same equipment, using the same canvas, same ink, etc. Also&#8212;same 2-year warranty.</p>
<p>3. CGProPrints offers a few items that COD does not, e.g., metal prints.</p>
<p>4. Pricing and sale promotions differ.</p>
<p>Hopefully others here will find this info useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kerry		</title>
		<link>https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-1941</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 12:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gillphotos.com/?p=7421#comment-1941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Somehow I got the impression that CGPro was the same entity as Canvas On Demand--- not true?

My canvas saga. Creds: I shot semi-professionally for many years and published hundreds of images. I&#039;ve more or less retired from photography as an income source, but in the last few years have been turning my professional office into a gallery of my work. I have hung about 50-60 canvases in sizes up to 24x36&quot;, from about four different printers. Most (the great majority) were from Canvas On Demand (couldn&#039;t resist the frequent deals that COD offered via Groupon). I have never had any issues re/ color fidelity or any other right-out-of-the-box issues. Shipped promptly. 

However, between year one and year two of ownership, I&#039;ve had about a half-dozen of the COD prints exhibit problems with glue failure between the canvas and the flat backing---the prints developed large, obvious bubbles. COD replaced the defective prints, no questions asked, under their two-year warranty, no cost to me (kudos, great customer support). Now I&#039;m concerned that the problem may become more epidemic as my print collection gets past that two-year warranty mark. I would hate to sell one of these prints to a client (which I do from time to time), only to have them call me at two years and three months reporting that the print is getting &quot;bubbled.&quot; 

Recently just placed my first order for some premium wrapped canvases with CGPro, which appears to have the same glued-down anatomy as the COD prints. Anyone here run into glue failure problems with CGPro?

Obviously one way to avoid the problem entirely is to just go with a stretched canvas product, no backing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I got the impression that CGPro was the same entity as Canvas On Demand&#8212; not true?</p>
<p>My canvas saga. Creds: I shot semi-professionally for many years and published hundreds of images. I&#8217;ve more or less retired from photography as an income source, but in the last few years have been turning my professional office into a gallery of my work. I have hung about 50-60 canvases in sizes up to 24&#215;36&#8243;, from about four different printers. Most (the great majority) were from Canvas On Demand (couldn&#8217;t resist the frequent deals that COD offered via Groupon). I have never had any issues re/ color fidelity or any other right-out-of-the-box issues. Shipped promptly. </p>
<p>However, between year one and year two of ownership, I&#8217;ve had about a half-dozen of the COD prints exhibit problems with glue failure between the canvas and the flat backing&#8212;the prints developed large, obvious bubbles. COD replaced the defective prints, no questions asked, under their two-year warranty, no cost to me (kudos, great customer support). Now I&#8217;m concerned that the problem may become more epidemic as my print collection gets past that two-year warranty mark. I would hate to sell one of these prints to a client (which I do from time to time), only to have them call me at two years and three months reporting that the print is getting &#8220;bubbled.&#8221; </p>
<p>Recently just placed my first order for some premium wrapped canvases with CGPro, which appears to have the same glued-down anatomy as the COD prints. Anyone here run into glue failure problems with CGPro?</p>
<p>Obviously one way to avoid the problem entirely is to just go with a stretched canvas product, no backing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Thompson Photography, LLC		</title>
		<link>https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-1933</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Thompson Photography, LLC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2018 21:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gillphotos.com/?p=7421#comment-1933</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I tried to do business with CG Pro and nothing worked.  An image arrived from them washed out and the colors and intensity not what I had sent.  I immediately contacted &quot;Brian&quot; who was great, promised fast service and everything would be taken care of.  I communicated the slight delay to my customer and promised a quick turnaround per Brian.  It&#039;s now been three weeks and I don&#039;t even have a second image for my customer.  My customer has now canceled their order with me and I doubt they&#039;ll be back.  Huge disappointment - all CG Pro communications speak to a 3 business day turnaround and it&#039;s now been 3 weeks and I don&#039;t have anything except a bad image with my customers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to do business with CG Pro and nothing worked.  An image arrived from them washed out and the colors and intensity not what I had sent.  I immediately contacted &#8220;Brian&#8221; who was great, promised fast service and everything would be taken care of.  I communicated the slight delay to my customer and promised a quick turnaround per Brian.  It&#8217;s now been three weeks and I don&#8217;t even have a second image for my customer.  My customer has now canceled their order with me and I doubt they&#8217;ll be back.  Huge disappointment &#8211; all CG Pro communications speak to a 3 business day turnaround and it&#8217;s now been 3 weeks and I don&#8217;t have anything except a bad image with my customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Trent Gillespie		</title>
		<link>https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-1932</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trent Gillespie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2018 15:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gillphotos.com/?p=7421#comment-1932</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-1931&quot;&gt;Jennifer Pratt&lt;/a&gt;.

We have not tried CGPro for metal. We&#039;ve used ProDPI for metal in the past and have always been impressed. Maybe we will try it in the future and touch back here. Let us know too!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-1931">Jennifer Pratt</a>.</p>
<p>We have not tried CGPro for metal. We&#8217;ve used ProDPI for metal in the past and have always been impressed. Maybe we will try it in the future and touch back here. Let us know too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jennifer Pratt		</title>
		<link>https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-1931</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Pratt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2018 15:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gillphotos.com/?p=7421#comment-1931</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi, I&#039;m wondering if you have tried CGPro for Metal Prints and if so how the quality is for those. I&#039;ve been very happy with their canvas, just haven&#039;t yet tried the metal prints.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m wondering if you have tried CGPro for Metal Prints and if so how the quality is for those. I&#8217;ve been very happy with their canvas, just haven&#8217;t yet tried the metal prints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rion		</title>
		<link>https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-1859</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 19:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gillphotos.com/?p=7421#comment-1859</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Glad to hear that.  I just ordered my first one from them, but if it works out it will really save me some $$$]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear that.  I just ordered my first one from them, but if it works out it will really save me some $$$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Trent Gillespie		</title>
		<link>https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-1364</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trent Gillespie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gillphotos.com/?p=7421#comment-1364</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-1363&quot;&gt;lisa&lt;/a&gt;.

Hello Lisa,

We use them regularly. Just submitted a canvas order with them on Monday and it was delivered today. So far we&#039;ve had no issues.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-1363">lisa</a>.</p>
<p>Hello Lisa,</p>
<p>We use them regularly. Just submitted a canvas order with them on Monday and it was delivered today. So far we&#8217;ve had no issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lisa		</title>
		<link>https://www.gillphotos.com/for-photographers/cg-pro-prints-canvas-review/#comment-1363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lisa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gillphotos.com/?p=7421#comment-1363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi, I was wondering if you are still using CGPro Prints for canvases and if you&#039;re satisfied with the quality? Thanks for your time!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I was wondering if you are still using CGPro Prints for canvases and if you&#8217;re satisfied with the quality? Thanks for your time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 0/100 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.gillphotos.com
Minified using Disk
Database Caching using Redis

Served from: www.gillphotos.com @ 2026-05-04 06:28:45 by W3 Total Cache
-->